Hmm. Good question. (I've used a twist lately, so I hope I'm not wrong here!) I don't think it's about what makes a good twist good, it's about what makes a bad twist bad. A bad twist, this one for example, uses information that seems contradictory to what we know. Here, we're led to believe that Misha is alive, because all of the evidence points to it. Shizune's monologue, the timeline, and the letter, all give compelling evidence to support the idea that Misha is doin' fine. To be told that all that evidence is wrong, because reasons, is insulting to the reader. We know how to extrapolate from context, don't go telling us that ghosts can send emails or some crap. It goes against the logic of the story.brythain wrote:Well, clearly my foray into the ancient underbelly of KS fanfic has borne low-hanging fruit. There are many others, but one question I'd like to ask is: when is a twist 'fair'? I'm not saying that feeling cheated by a blatant 'it was all a dream' or some such isn't legitimate; I would feel that too, especially if inexcusably OOC.
A good twist will allow you make make assumptions based on no evidence. In my case, I brought up the 'multiple worlds' theory, and allowed the reader to assume that the character dynamics hadn't changed. I allowed the possibility of a twist, but I didn't confirm of deny anything, or even allude to it. By using vague terms and letting the readers fill in the details, they have no one to blame but themselves when the rug is pulled out from under them. Think of the Sixth Sense. The twist works because the possibility existed, IE seeing dead people, and the facts never imply anything contrary. No one talks to Bruce Willis throughout the movie. He has virtually no real interactions, but you don't notice this, and you don't stop to think about it. (Since then, M. Night has used further and further stretches to use 'the twist'. In the Village, it was 'Can you really have an entire town, hidden near a metropolitan area, and NEVER have any interaction? What about planes or helicopters? Sirens? Hikers?' In 'Devil', the entire premise is invalidated when they reveal that the character killed halfway through was the demon, when the whole point was that it was a Locked Room mystery. They heavily implied, almost outright stated, that she was dead, and therefore, not the demon. By telling us 'she was just faking it', they contradict themselves. And why her? Why not one of the other dead people? There's no logic, no sudden reevaluation of the events thus far. It was like a damn dice roll of an ending. Hell, a better twist would have been that someone outside the elevator was the demon, because you assumed the demon was inside the elevator.
That.... that got long. I'm sorry. I've had, ah, issues with M. Night since Avatar. I, uh, really like Avatar. So, the movie was... I'll stop now.