Valjean Lafitte wrote:IBut if we still use Pedagogy to put all other dev fiction on the same level of fan fiction, then we should also disregard the canonicity of the Class 3-3 picture that told us Suzu and most of the class' names to begin with. According to Aura it wasn't meant to be canon, but he admitted a decent argument could be made for that position because...Suriko is the one who made the image. Which takes us back to square one. If we accept nothing outside of the game as canon, then Suzu, Haruhiko, Molly, Taro, etc., don't really have "canon" disabilities, or even names for that matter.
I said nothing about accepting nothing outside the game as canon, though. Compare the 3-3 image with the Miki route: Suriko doesn't disavow the first but expressly disavows the second. In fact, Suriko says explicitly that it is based on a 'dusted off' 'old scenario plan' and implicitly that it's not to be bitched about re 'canon' because it's in the fanfic section. Silentcook's later edit (go back to the
first page here to see) removes any hint that the Miki route is canonical in any way. However, as with some people and Scissorlips' Suzu pseudo route, you're quite welcome to treat it as headcanon.
Summary: if plausibly canon and not disavowed (plus has dev support for some canonicity), then status is ambiguous; if unambiguously disavowed, then unambiguously not canon.
This is why we're discussing it in the headcanon thread.