That's my only main difference from what you described really - that for me a work and its characters don't quite belong to 'the public' (a term that I find a bit too nebulous really). They do exist within the public eye, sure (as much as any adult person always exists within the public eye to some extent), but at the end of the day they only belong to themselves. They are 'their own man/woman/entity' as strange as it sounds. I find this line of thinking a bit more comfortable, because if they belong to 'the public' then if said public votes that say...two characters, whom they ship dearly, should get together and have raunchy sex in said work's future, then surely that must always happen because it belongs to 'the public' fanbase and that is the will of its majority...yeah...please...no.

Now this is just how I personally feel about fiction in general, but of course (and sometimes quite thankfully I might add, because it tethers me to reality) my mind doesn't let me off that easily. It always says: 'Okay, that's a very fine way of looking at fiction, but you do realize these stories and characters don't exist in our world, right? So why the heck are you thinking about them this damn much if they're not even your own creations?'And that's the point where I usually answer with: 'Well, because every work of fiction is in some way tethered to the author(s) that created it and that is a real person with experiences in this world.' Usually that's enough, but when you get a straightforward answer like Aura's it tends to send me spinning again.

But I guess, ultimately, it doesn't matter that much as far as fiction itself is considered. The main reason, why we read things and perceive fictional characters as 'real people' to a degree, isn't because we think exactly or even similarly to the author about them. It's moreso because our experiences and feelings (which are more often than not very different from that of the author to begin with) mirror that of those characters and thus we can relate to a degree. So to put it bluntly, it's rarely about what we think of fiction but rather how we feel about it. It's very hard to feel something for a character like Patrick Bateman from American Psycho (even though he's a brilliantly thought out character), but it is far easier to do so with someone like Hanako. Same applies to Rin...it's hard for most to feel as she does (and thus feel as if you understand her), but since she isn't a malicious or hateful person her brand of irrational logic is still at least moreso approachable. That is, of course, if people want to approach it beyond the surface observations of: 'she's just kooky/zany/silly etc.'
And on the topic of freedom...I've always found it funny that most people don't realize just how utterly painful 'absolute' freedom really can be. But I suppose that's because most people never get to be free for any significant duration of time, wether in real life or in their own minds. Rin's path actually demonstrates this pain and what it's about very well too...as it also demonstrates how to deal with that pain. *shrug*
