Page 4 of 5

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 5:48 pm
by AaronIsCrunchy
I think it's only left open in a sense that you wonder what happened to each character and (in event of good ending) how their relationship panned out. In a way, I prefer the lack of closure as it allows for speculation and discussion on boards such as these :)

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 7:12 pm
by SpunkySix
AaronIsCrunchy wrote:I think it's only left open in a sense that you wonder what happened to each character and (in event of good ending) how their relationship panned out. In a way, I prefer the lack of closure as it allows for speculation and discussion on boards such as these :)
I constantly have an internal battle when I think about KS over whether such ambiguity with so much relationship left unseen is better, or if I'd rather see the couples through to marriage and maybe even death.

That's not something we think about much, huh? These characters will all eventually die, realistically. What mark do they leave on their world before then?

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 7:13 pm
by Darklord13
When i said ''a sequel'' i meant something like Sisterhood.A (small) continuation of each route.I wouldn't mind reading their(hanako and hisao)first date.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 7:29 pm
by AaronIsCrunchy
SpunkySix wrote:
AaronIsCrunchy wrote:I think it's only left open in a sense that you wonder what happened to each character and (in event of good ending) how their relationship panned out. In a way, I prefer the lack of closure as it allows for speculation and discussion on boards such as these :)
I constantly have an internal battle when I think about KS over whether such ambiguity with so much relationship left unseen is better, or if I'd rather see the couples through to marriage and maybe even death.

That's not something we think about much, huh? These characters will all eventually die, realistically. What mark do they leave on their world before then?
GAH, that's a thought. I think Shizune would probably leave the widest impact on people through her philanthropy, regardless whether she chooses to do so using her wealth or through the Salvation Army (or the Japanese equivalent, be it the Sally Army or something else). If all goes to plan, Lilly might inspire a generation of English-speakers, which to her would probably be a great achievement. It could be that any of them view their personal lives, be it with Hisao or others, as their legacy, proud of their children and what they could go on to achieve.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 7:48 pm
by bhtooefr
There's always mehkanik's (that guy's) stories, for continuations of each route (Hanako and Emi completed), and brythain's story (for continuations of Lilly's bad end from many POVs, to death for most characters).

Warning, with mehkanik's stories, you will hate Emi, and then later feel sorry for Hisao. And you'll feel horrified for Hanako.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 10:38 pm
by SpunkySix
bhtooefr wrote:with mehkanik's stories, you will hate Emi
I'll... pass, on that one.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 11:21 am
by Atario
SpunkySix wrote:see the couples through to marriage and maybe even death.

That's not something we think about much, huh? These characters will all eventually die, realistically.
I love how you spoiler-tagged one of human life's universal inevitabilities. :o

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 12:08 pm
by brythain
Atario wrote:
SpunkySix wrote:see the couples through to marriage and maybe even death.

That's not something we think about much, huh? These characters will all eventually die, realistically.
I love how you spoiler-tagged one of human life's universal inevitabilities. :o
I must say that writing fanfic that takes these people (they're not just characters anymore if you write fanfic, right? :) ) to marriage and even to death is a bit extreme. It's also very painful for both writer and reader, I think.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 12:33 pm
by AaronIsCrunchy
brythain wrote:
Atario wrote:
SpunkySix wrote:see the couples through to marriage and maybe even death.

That's not something we think about much, huh? These characters will all eventually die, realistically.
I love how you spoiler-tagged one of human life's universal inevitabilities. :o
I must say that writing fanfic that takes these people (they're not just characters anymore if you write fanfic, right? :) ) to marriage and even to death is a bit extreme. It's also very painful for both writer and reader, I think.
Writing to death would take FOREVER, unless it's a tragedy where it starts to look like Hisao's life is getting on track and then BAM, heart attack. And reading fanfiction that challenges War and Peace in length would get tedious after a while, unless it was stupidly well written. And then it's a matter of if the writer is up to that. Not gonna lie, I could handle reading a fanfic up to marriage, but then I'm a soppy wotsit really :L

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 2:26 pm
by Aura
This whole thing of people feeling the stories are unfinished because they don't cover something like the entire lives or even just significantly longer timeframes of the characters is not something we thought would happen. There are two explanations: either it's the fan phenomenon at work, or we actually did cut the stories too short to make for satisfactory conclusions.

If you think about the narrative arcs in KS though, you can probably see why they end when they do. Every ending resolves the plot, more or less. It would've been really weird to continue the stories from that point onward, at least for me. Longer timeframes would've made the novel different, almost definitely more slice-of-lifey. But even if KS is a character-focused story, we wanted to do storytelling, not write biographies or do pure character based sitcom. In fact, KS has a lot of hot air in it and should be considerably shorter, in my opinion.

I think I'm biased to thinking like this in things I'm not personally responsible for. I don't watch season after season of TV shows, or read multi-volume fantasy epics, I just don't care for that kind of thing.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 7:34 pm
by SpunkySix
brythain wrote:It's also very painful for both writer and reader, I think.
Ah, but sometimes those are the most important things to address.

I can understand why you're thinking that, Aura. I disagree, personally I like longer stories with lots of parts and arcs and all that, (PPGZ needed more than two seasons) but I can see why you might not.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 9:11 pm
by brythain
I think Aura's right, in the sense that KS can be satisfactory on its own; each conclusion can be an ending and that is all. However, humans do like a little bit of 'what if', and that's why novels like 'Gone With The Wind' and 'Pride and Prejudice' are perfectly good on their own, but still get sequels made.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 9:53 pm
by Ritter Delorges
I think those things are called "visual novels" because (especially in English) "novel" has become the default term for long prose. However I think that at least in the case of KS the individual routes are better viewed as novellas. Of course the whole thing is something else, but I would argue that it is still isn't really a traditional novel proper.

The difference is not just one of word count but of the scope of what it wants to show. A typical novel shows an extended journey of a character and the development of that character. In such a work it makes sense to cover a substantial part of the protagonist's life, explore his background in detail and possibly provide some sense of closure to his journey. Novellas on the other hand tend to focus on an event. Characters are explored in relation to that. Backgrounds and futures can remain sketchy. What is important is how the characters fit into this event and any backstory exists to explain that. This event does not have to be literally one instant. Instead it can be something slightly more complex like "How I fell in love with X", but that is still very different from "The life and adventures of Hisao and X". It doesn't attempt to tell us all there is to know about the characters, but all there is to know about how they met and fell in love and what that meant for them.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 10:14 pm
by brythain
Ritter Delorges wrote:I think those things are called "visual novels" because (especially in English) "novel" has become the default term for long prose. However I think that at least in the case of KS the individual routes are better viewed as novellas. Of course the whole thing is something else, but I would argue that it is still isn't really a traditional novel proper.

The difference is not just one of word count but of the scope of what it wants to show. A typical novel shows an extended journey of a character and the development of that character. In such a work it makes sense to cover a substantial part of the protagonist's life, explore his background in detail and possibly provide some sense of closure to his journey. Novellas on the other hand tend to focus on an event. Characters are explored in relation to that. Backgrounds and futures can remain sketchy. What is important is how the characters fit into this event and any backstory exists to explain that. This event does not have to be literally one instant. Instead it can be something slightly more complex like "How I fell in love with X", but that is still very different from "The life and adventures of Hisao and X". It doesn't attempt to tell us all there is to know about the characters, but all there is to know about how they met and fell in love and what that meant for them.
I think this is a useful way to look at it. For myself, a VN and its possible outcomes are like a compilation around a theme, in which a basic scenario is provided and authors are invited to contribute possible or plausible outcomes that are consistent with that basic scenario (much of Act 1, in this case). The choices that a VN reader has are completely constrained, so all the possible combinations can be assigned to different authors and/or different outcome-stories.

A sequel to this VN can then be thought of in terms of taking one of those outcome-stories as a new basic scenario or 'starting node', and then developing it—a sort of extended epilogue. It's not everybody's cup of tea, but it can be entertaining for people who preferred that particular outcome-story or who had an interest of some sort in that particular outcome-story.

Re: Is it just me?

Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:00 pm
by Potato
arthritis_5 wrote:OK Im agreeing this this person. I NEED A SECOND GAME... 4LS left the game wide open for a second part
...What version did you play? :?