Page 1 of 5

Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:08 pm
by Eab1990
Besides the fact that "Kenji was right."

(Warning: NSFW link)

http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/06/2 ... -in-eroge/

Pretty BS if you ask me.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:28 pm
by JamiroquaiAlien
"Girl"? Does that mean all VNs have to be yaoi now? If so, fuck.

But yeah, not entirely bothered about this. None of the banned concepts really interest me, so it's all cool in the 'hood.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:33 pm
by Eab1990
"Girl" I assume is "Shoujo," which might translate into yuri. Would make sense, since yaoi and shota aren't on the list, due to lol, feminists.

Edit: It might also stand for "Joshi," meaning high school girls. Still pretty failure on the feminists part.

And yeah, half of the fetishes make up the bottom of the barrel of h-games, but the list as a whole is pretty stupid. Thankfully, it's only a union thing... for now.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:34 pm
by Guest
JamiroquaiAlien wrote: But yeah, not entirely bothered about this. None of the banned concepts really interest me, so it's all cool in the 'hood.
Are you familiar with this piece of work?

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

Then they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
I did not protest;
I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
I did not speak out;
I was not a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out for me.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:36 pm
by JamiroquaiAlien
No yuri?

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

Also, you can hardly compare banning virtual rape to Nazi persecution. There are a few elements of the list that are perhaps unnecessary, but at least some of it is moderately justifiable.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:36 pm
by strangerthanfiction
Only 3 responses before this thread was Godwin'd. That's got to be some sort of record.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:39 pm
by Eab1990
JamiroquaiAlien wrote:No yuri?

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

Also, you can hardly compare banning virtual rape to Nazi persecution. There are a few elements of the list that are perhaps unnecessary, but at least some of it is moderately justifiable.
I disapprove of loli bans.

Also, whoever suggested "student council" needs to be shot. Repeatedly.

Not that I'm fond of Shizune. Misha's okay. But in any case, I'm more partial to a green-haired student council president in Akane-iro. >_>

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:43 pm
by Caesius
I lol'd at "Train Molestation"

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:46 pm
by strangerthanfiction
Hey,those trains are just asking for it, I tell ya! What with thier hard, straight smokestacks and round, round wheels...

...that's not what that means, is it?

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:54 pm
by Eab1990
The sad thing is, rule 34 of trains probably exists. An h-game of trains, maybe not so much. But you never know. >_>

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:48 pm
by Hypothermia
To people saying and thinking "I don't like that stuff so I don't care", it's about what you like, it's about these things being illegal because feminists are fucking stupid. I don't care for almost anything on that list, but I still worry. I don't know.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:04 pm
by ROFLWAFFLE!
What's wez gonna do with our damn loli?
Though I saw some Japanese porn image from a cover (preg chicks giving birth... Scarred. D:)
FFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:11 pm
by KronosIII
This really really really pisses me off.

For the fact that this is a disgrace to personal freedoms. It may be phucked up shit, but who is to judge what we can or can't do. The shit is not even real, IT IS FUCKING DRAWN. I mean.........WTF? IT IS NOT REAL!!!

What your going to start banning famous pieces of artwork next? HELL I GUESS WE SHOULD BAN THE BIBLE WHILE WE ARE AT IT. Has RAPE/INCEST/PEDO/BESTIALITY.

hELL OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SMOKED POT.............now it is the fucking devil

ALCOHOL WAS BANNED FROM THE U.S....................now it is legal again

And now we got this shit going on in Japan, this is a disgrace to the word freedom. Knew about this before post, but it is still a strike to the balls for freedom.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:18 pm
by ROFLWAFFLE!
KronosIII wrote:This really really really pisses me off.

For the fact that this is a disgrace to personal freedoms. It may be phucked up shit, but who is to judge what we can or can't do. The shit is not even real, IT IS FUCKING DRAWN. I mean.........WTF? IT IS NOT REAL!!!

What your going to start banning famous pieces of artwork next? HELL I GUESS WE SHOULD BAN THE BIBLE WHILE WE ARE AT IT. Has RAPE/INCEST/PEDO/BESTIALITY.

hELL OUR FOUNDING FATHERS SMOKED POT.............now it is the fucking devil

ALCOHOL WAS BANNED FROM THE U.S....................now it is legal again

And now we got this shit going on in Japan, this is a disgrace to the word freedom. Knew about this before post, but it is still a strike to the balls for freedom.
Like I said, they need to fucking suck it up and forget that it exists.

Re: Your response to this?

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:25 pm
by abscess
ROFL. I'm pretty sure that's just bullshit. Else it will be pretty interesting to see how either the media evades the bullet or chews it.
If the prime minister (?) is so intent on getting the NEETs out of their basements and this is a very real piece of news, then it's a very interesting move and could prove very effective if it actually works, no matter if the ban is just a threat and nothing more or if its made to stay. The NEETs could be played like a violin ;)