I wrote up some thoughts on the route some time ago, which you might have seen (Shizune’s section is about halfway down):
https://auricorange.wordpress.com/2021/ ... rospecive/
A22 responded here:
https://ks.renai.us/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=12812
I should have been less of a dick, but excepting my framing and the developmental matters he refuted, I’d stand by the essence of what I wrote.
There’s a scene where Hisao compares Shizune to a live wire; flailing energetically, but without any ultimate goal or purpose. I’d say the same of the route. Individual facets are good. The desire to off-screeen important moments is interesting. Shizune is original. Jigoro is funny. Misha’s scenes are emotional. Hisao is compelling in the final scene.
But none of these come together to be more than the sum of their parts. Jigoro’s sequence adds little to Misha’s sequence, and vice versa. Compare that to other KS routes, where tonal notes and events tend to build toward the same thing. The counterargument is that everything in Shizune’s route exists to shed light on her character, but that’s weak, IMO. It’s not like the other KS routes DON’T reveal character, and while Shizune seems more complicated than Lilly, Hanako, and Emi, I don’t think she’s interesting enough to warrant making her the focus.
The advantage of leaving story elements ambiguous is that it makes your audience think about alternative, interesting possibilities. Does the replicant save Deckard at the end of Blade Runner because it's become more human? Because it realises it's about to die, and that killing Deckard would be pointless? Because, facing death, it gains an appreciation for the sanctity of life? To spite Deckard by proving itself a better person? All interesting to think about. That's not true of Shizune's route. Why is Shizune the way she is? A) It’s her innate personality, B) Her dad is an ass, C) Something we can’t possibly know, D) Some combination of the above. It’s ambiguous, but there's nothing to really think about, and none of the solutions change much.
With all this said: I’ve come to think there’s a meta reading of Shizune’s route that IS interesting.
I wish I’d compared Shizune to Beethoven. There’s the obvious – we all just learn about and then kind of ignore the insane fact that one of our greatest composers was deaf. But also, by all accounts: Beethoven was a titanic jackass; immensely combative, difficult, and exhausting to deal with.
How do you weigh Beethoven’s legacy against what he was like as a person? His music has made millions happy across centuries. Does that justify how he was?
Shizune is Shizune. She’s difficult, driven, perfectionist, and hypercritical. She knows that. She knows she can make people miserable - but, she also creates amazing experiences for the Yamaku students that make hundreds happy. Does that justify how she is?
You might say “It’s possible to do great things professionally, and also be nice. This isn't a dichotomy.” Sure – but I don’t think that
every given person can do both. Shizune can never be like Lilly, no matter how hard she tries. It'll always be an act, in defiance of her own nature, and even iron-willed Shizune will eventually let her real self bleed through into the role.
If you are difficult and abrasive and perfectionist, and make the people around you miserable – but you aren’t evil - what are you supposed to do with your self?
I think that's the question Shizune's route wants to answer. And, after much meandering, it does; reaching the same answer Beethoven reached – you can channel your difficult personality in service to the greater good.
I don't think that's something most people can relate to, but it is interesting. And it's made more interesting by the route's own existence serving as commentary on the same question. Few people love it, but most have gotten something out of it. It’s probably made more people happy than you or I will with everything we ever do in our entire lives. Now, how exactly do you weigh that happiness against the infamous difficulty of…
And we'll leave the rest as an exercise for the reader.