(Where's the Walkthrough?)
https://ks.fhs.sh/
Its fairly commonplace for ten year olds to be on the Internet without supervision. And what parent wants to watch their kid play stupid flash games all day anyway?zanzarra wrote:That's right, irresponsible parents will never go out of style.newnar wrote:Kids under 10 surfing the net under supervision? It's 2012.
It's true. And most parents are computer illiterate enough that they have no idea what their kids are doing. It's obvious that it's more than "playing stupid flash games".Wannabefan wrote:Its fairly commonplace for ten year olds to be on the Internet without supervision. And what parent wants to watch their kid play stupid flash games all day anyway?zanzarra wrote:That's right, irresponsible parents will never go out of style.newnar wrote:Kids under 10 surfing the net under supervision? It's 2012.
I don't think the 70+ is a troll; someone on 4chan earlier today had an anecdote about his grandfather really liked it (and him being some sort of writing professional, IIRC), and he was 91 or so.A Humbled Fan wrote:Thank you.Benkei wrote:The borders only fail you for that infinitesimal moment in time where you are exactly the border age (e.g. 15 years 0 months 0 days 0 hours minutes 0 seconds 0 tenth-seconds 0 hundredth-seconds ...). If you take the poll before that moment, then you are below the indicated age (so to use the 15yo example, you'd be 14 years 11 months 29 or 30 days old, so you should vote "10-15"). If you take the poll after that moment, then you are above the indicated age. And if it really bothers you that the poll is going to be wrong for you in just a matter of a few days, then ffs don't vote until you're comfortable voting. But it really isn't rocket science, people. Either you're above a given border age (if even only by a few seconds) or you're below it.
Also, those that are voting <10 or 70+, even if they are trolls, they are considered "outliers". I know that outliers can in theory affect confidence intervals, but since this is a faux survey, then I'm saying they don't matter.
Wow that's interesting! One of the few.Merlyn_LeRoy wrote:I don't think the 70+ is a troll; someone on 4chan earlier today had an anecdote about his grandfather really liked it (and him being some sort of writing professional, IIRC), and he was 91 or so.A Humbled Fan wrote:Thank you.Benkei wrote:The borders only fail you for that infinitesimal moment in time where you are exactly the border age (e.g. 15 years 0 months 0 days 0 hours minutes 0 seconds 0 tenth-seconds 0 hundredth-seconds ...). If you take the poll before that moment, then you are below the indicated age (so to use the 15yo example, you'd be 14 years 11 months 29 or 30 days old, so you should vote "10-15"). If you take the poll after that moment, then you are above the indicated age. And if it really bothers you that the poll is going to be wrong for you in just a matter of a few days, then ffs don't vote until you're comfortable voting. But it really isn't rocket science, people. Either you're above a given border age (if even only by a few seconds) or you're below it.
Also, those that are voting <10 or 70+, even if they are trolls, they are considered "outliers". I know that outliers can in theory affect confidence intervals, but since this is a faux survey, then I'm saying they don't matter.
Play me off, Rin
thats completely arbitrary though. it could just as easily go the other way. i am 25, i dont say "i am 25 and X months and X days" so either of the categories that include 25 look equally applicable to me. your explanation makes sense, but its 6 pages in, and its still gonna throw off your results.Benkei wrote:The borders only fail you for that infinitesimal moment in time where you are exactly the border age (e.g. 15 years 0 months 0 days 0 hours minutes 0 seconds 0 tenth-seconds 0 hundredth-seconds ...). If you take the poll before that moment, then you are below the indicated age (so to use the 15yo example, you'd be 14 years 11 months 29 or 30 days old, so you should vote "10-15"). If you take the poll after that moment, then you are above the indicated age. And if it really bothers you that the poll is going to be wrong for you in just a matter of a few days, then ffs don't vote until you're comfortable voting. But it really isn't rocket science, people. Either you're above a given border age (if even only by a few seconds) or you're below it.
I know that feel, bro. I've got the same birthday coming up in less than 2 weeks.vaektor wrote:I turned 32 three days ago. A romantic at heart, this game's right up my alley. I feel kinda old compared to the majority of folks here, but we all have loved and wanted to be loved so it makes us all the same, I suppose.
Yeah... life's getting pretty serious and I'm trying to figure out what to do with the rest of it. KS kinda opened my eyes to some possibilities, but I'm pretty sure whatever happens it's gonna be a solo act for a while. No worries tho. Hope your birthday is as chill as mineCNB wrote:I know that feel, bro. I've got the same birthday coming up in less than 2 weeks.vaektor wrote:I turned 32 three days ago. A romantic at heart, this game's right up my alley. I feel kinda old compared to the majority of folks here, but we all have loved and wanted to be loved so it makes us all the same, I suppose.
Which is why I find that case of two minors being charged as adults for sending nudes to each other on their phones as ridiculously idiotic. Oh, the irony of how 'we want to protect the children' has turned upon and against the children themselves. Curse those uptight paranoiac puritans for doing this to our law system..No matter what you do to stop them, if they really want it, the children will find pornography. And if they can't find it, they will make it themselves. That is the reality of the current society we have in the world.
Uh oh, I feel like this thread is about to get crazy.asakayosapro wrote:Which is why I find that case of two minors being charged as adults for sending nudes to each other on their phones as ridiculously idiotic. Oh, the irony of how 'we want to protect the children' has turned upon and against the children themselves. Curse those uptight paranoiac puritans for doing this to our law system..
I'm sure senior citizens spend plenty of time on the web. They have to do something in those retirement homes.jsc_tidus wrote:70+.. Really..?? I mean, really??