Katawa Shoujo Forums

Anyway who plays this game for the "adult content" is missing the point of the game.

If you really want, you can just go in and remove it manually from the game if you think your kids are going to play it.

I don't understand why people are talking about this in the first place.

Libra wrote:Anyway who plays this game for the "adult content" is missing the point of the game.

If you really want, you can just go in and remove it manually from the game if you think your kids are going to play it.

I don't understand why people are talking about this in the first place.

Well, there was a misunderstanding on what remove adult content meant. OP thought it would remove nudity as well, but it didn't. Then there was a discussion on the meaning of "adult content" itself and now we are arguing on what constitutes porn or not.

Never thought I would have this kind of discussion on a cripple sex game forum. It's amusing to say the least.

encrypted12345 wrote:

Libra wrote:Anyway who plays this game for the "adult content" is missing the point of the game.

If you really want, you can just go in and remove it manually from the game if you think your kids are going to play it.

I don't understand why people are talking about this in the first place.

Well, there was a misunderstanding on what remove adult content meant. OP thought it would remove nudity as well, but it didn't. Then there was a discussion on the meaning of "adult content" itself and now we are arguing on what constitutes porn or not.

Never thought I would have this kind of discussion on a cripple sex game forum. It's amusing to say the least.

Thanks for bringing me up to speed.

Well.. I don't think nudity is a form of porn,

This discussion is now boring and pointless. Are we allowed to post nudity on the forums?

Paddy wrote: And for private schooling. Public school's pathetic by comparison (so I hear). I was educated in Catholic school since 2nd grade, and before then a Montessori school. Those were GOOD teachers. They paid a dear price for it, and Lord knows they were never rich. But damn it, they cared enough to pay for me to get a good, Catholic education. $5000 a year. Learned a helluva lot. Scare tactics in sex ed? No. Evolution? Hell yes, and that it is certainly reconcilable to a Christian faith. (God bless my biology teacher, Mr. Fyfe. Such a funny man, and such a good teacher.) History (including *gasp* the history of Judaism and Christianity)? Frank and open. No one was perfect. There were slaughters on all sides. Not to mention Moral Theology, Catholic Social Teaching, Church History (it was a separate class), and Hebrew and Christian Scriptures.

lol Didn't realize the Alice in Wonderland link was to an idiotic adaptation. I assumed you were going of about the book for some reason. Porn or not, it was pretty bad lol. If it was porn it was a failure of porn, and if it's cinema, it's a failure there too being too gimmicky and not enough story. If you can get a hard on from that movie, well, you're one deprived person lol.


Grats you had rich parents. The odds are about 1 in 100 of that happening in the US. I personally had idiot, self centered, broke parents that had a kid out of high school without a job, and no future. I'd crack a joke about the cruelty of God here, but it's people being thoughtless, selfish, jerks that cause most our problems. Some Schrodinger's deity isn't really doing much of anything. Though, I've heard the argument that inaction when action can help is evil.

Funny, I'm no Christian yet I read the new testament and old testament. I also read the Book of Mormon, Buddhist Suttras, studied Tao, Cherokee spiritual beliefs, Mayans, and a smidgen of Hindu. Mainly just so I can discuss and debate. It's a favorite past time.

Point is, if you want to argue a point, you have to do so actually knowing what it's about. Arguing a point while in ignorance is just going to make you lose the debate. All you're gunna get is a bunch of people rolling their eyes while you'll never know when you've lost the argument, because you put belief before objectivity and knowledge. and keep standing there like a stubborn mule.

Seriously, I feel like I won my argument a half dozen times, and you're just being obstinate because of your personal beliefs. Yet I keep getting suckered back. I don't wish to argue faith issues these forums, so I've been academic, yet you keep playing the belief card.

I quit. You can't win, and neither can I. I'm not posting in this thread against pointlessness. And I rather not get banned.

Daitengu wrote: lol Didn't realize the Alice in Wonderland link was to an idiotic adaptation. I assumed you were going of about the book for some reason. Porn or not, it was pretty bad lol. If it was porn it was a failure of porn, and if it's cinema, it's a failure there too being too gimmicky and not enough story. If you can get a hard on from that movie, well, you're one deprived person lol.

Why else would I provide links?
Never having seen it (and I'm not quite sure I want to see a cheesy 70s quasi-porn flick), I'm sure you're probably right.
Now, look. Here is America's test for pornographic content.

Grats you had rich parents.

Thank you for reading. -_- Do you know my father went into $60,000 worth of debt, which - rest his soul - we lost our house trying to pay off? (Thankfully he inherited his mother's house, my grandmother, may she rest in peace, and it is paid off in full.)

They earnestly gave a shit about my education. That's why they did it. Not because they were rich.
Was it excessive on their part? Perhaps. Homeschooling might have worked, too. (That's actually what folks used to do before there were public schools. Educate in-home.) Shame your parents didn't do the same for you.

Funny, I'm no Christian yet I read the new testament and old testament. I also read the Book of Mormon, Buddhist Suttras, studied Tao, Cherokee spiritual beliefs, Mayans, and a smidgen of Hindu. Mainly just so I can discuss and debate. It's a favorite past time.

Oh, do you know many times I and other serious Catholic have come across atheists who read holy books just to debate them? That's as old as Stonehenge and older. Not that debate is a bad thing. You can learn a lot in debate, through which you either end up strengthening your own beliefs, or questioning them.

Oh, and there's a lot more to Christianity than the Bible - or even the teaching authority of the Church (the Magisterium). There's philosophy, like the works of Thomas Aquinas and Augustine of Hippo (there are more recent ones I don't know well), there's history like the Church Fathers and their writings, not to mention exegesis, hermeneutics, and Biblical archaeology.

Any schlub can read the Bible and make his own religion or church out of it. (Case in point: Protestant Christianity, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Jesuism, and a whole slew of other "sola scriptura" based religions.) It takes a lot of effort, research, and humility - yes, humility, to read the texts unbiasedly - to stumble upon the religion Christ founded.

But I digress.

I quit. You can't win, and neither can I. I'm not posting in this thread against pointlessness. And I rather not get banned.

Suit yourself. I was enjoying talking to you. You seem like a real smart guy despite the fact that sometimes you are incorrect. Sorry if it seemed I was rubbing it in that I had a better education. But I'm just saying, I'm not a moron. And simply because I'm a Christian doesn't mean I am, either.

Paddy wrote: Oh, and there's a lot more to Christianity than the Bible - or even the teaching authority of the Church (the Magisterium). There's philosophy, like the works of Thomas Aquinas and Augustine of Hippo (there are more recent ones I don't know well), there's history like the Church Fathers and their writings, not to mention exegesis, hermeneutics, and Biblical archaeology.

Any schlub can read the Bible and make his own religion or church out of it. (Case in point: Protestant Christianity, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Jesuism, and a whole slew of other "sola scriptura" based religions.) It takes a lot of effort, research, and humility - yes, humility, to read the texts unbiasedly - to stumble upon the religion Christ founded.

Paddy wrote:I was enjoying talking to you. You seem like a real smart guy despite the fact that sometimes you are incorrect.

Haha, wow. Such arrogance =O

I wonder if you carry around a katana...

Anyone notice how the OP hasn't posted at all since he started this topic?
Seems pretty suspicious...

thenacho wrote:Anyone notice how the OP hasn't posted at all since he started this topic?
Seems pretty suspicious...

Maybe he has to wait till his sister isn't around to read and reply to it.

I think that this was settled. Why are people still debating this point? Considering both Aura and Suriko were involved and explained it, I don't see why people are still arguing here.

Because this is the internet?

Also, because some of us (read: me) love to debate, even when it's well beyond the point of arguing.

Paddy wrote:Also, because some of us (read: me) love to debate, even when it's well beyond the point of arguing.

No, you don't!

The O.H.L. wrote:I think that this was settled. Why are people still debating this point? Considering both Aura and Suriko were involved and explained it, I don't see why people are still arguing here.

Because:

Bigbishounen wrote:

The O.H.L. wrote:I think that this was settled. Why are people still debating this point? Considering both Aura and Suriko were involved and explained it, I don't see why people are still arguing here.

Because: