Re: Journey of a Non-otaku
Posted: Sun May 18, 2014 5:39 pm
"This" is a confirmation by the route's writer that this theory is rubbish, so why do you bring it up again?This, that's what I'm referencing.
"This" is a confirmation by the route's writer that this theory is rubbish, so why do you bring it up again?This, that's what I'm referencing.
Perhaps. But that doesn't bother me so much as it does that the times it does occur within the story feel so contrived. As in, it's as though they're there solely to have a sex scene rather than for any other meaningful purpose. After playing through both Hanako and Shizune, it still feels that way. Perhaps Rin or Lilly will be different, hopefully. From what I hear, Emi is something I probably shouldn't bother with...Atario wrote:Mmmmm. This explains a lot about this whole thread.Mandalorian wrote:All I know is that the topic of birth control gets me uncomfortable, so I don't really care. It's one of my convictions that sex shouldn't happen before marriage anyways
That's one of the reasons that it troubles me, yes. But more importantly, even were that not to be a problem, it's the psychological aspects of it that are most damaging. It causes low self-esteem and a higher probability of divorce, both with that person and with all future persons. Same goes for cohabitation. That, and I've had very close friends be hurt by such things, so it's also a personal matter for me. But that's neither here nor there.SpunkySix wrote:I have very mixed opinions on this. It doesn't seem wrong in itself, but then you remember that there's potential for a child to happen, and if the relationship isn't stable when it does, that could spell major trouble for a child who did nothing wrong, something I'd feel awful about forever. I was very against it before reading KS, but now it feels like a gray area.Atario wrote:Mmmmm. This explains a lot about this whole thread.Mandalorian wrote:All I know is that the topic of birth control gets me uncomfortable, so I don't really care. It's one of my convictions that sex shouldn't happen before marriage anyways
Welcome to the world of visual novels, I'm afraid. IME (admittedly limited), KS is one of the better ones in that regard among those that are romance-oriented.Mandalorian wrote:Perhaps. But that doesn't bother me so much as it does that the times it does occur within the story feel so contrived. As in, it's as though they're there solely to have a sex scene rather than for any other meaningful purpose.Atario wrote:Mmmmm. This explains a lot about this whole thread.Mandalorian wrote:All I know is that the topic of birth control gets me uncomfortable, so I don't really care. It's one of my convictions that sex shouldn't happen before marriage anyways
^^^^bhtooefr wrote:I believe you'll find that in areas of the US where divorce rates are lower and the percentage of those professing belief in typical "Christian" values is higher, domestic violence and spousal rape (if the area even makes spousal rape illegal) occurrences are also higher. I know, correlation isn't causation, but enough correlation looks awfully suspicious.
Basically, premarital sex and cohabitation leading to divorce isn't the actual correlation, it's likely a society more tolerant of divorce (instead of beating or raping your spouse) is one that's also more tolerant of premarital sex and cohabitation.
Except it was.Mandalorian wrote:The only problem is that the intention wasn't to coax Hisao into bed, just like how when Hisao showed her his scar, it wasn't to coax her into bed. I just went back and rewatched the scene, and she just wanted to show him the full extent of the scarring and better explain what happened to her. And then Hisao starts taking his clothes off and getting all sexual for no reason. It was just very contrived and kind of ruined the mood of what would be an otherwise very touching scene.
So have all of the potential consequences of doing it before being in a position of stability... I've always said, if you want to gamble because the chances of winning are high enough, then fine, but gamble with your own life and not somebody else's.Potato wrote:Sex has been around much, much longer than the arbitrary concept of marriage.
Yeah, there is no gambling with somebody else's life anyway so that's just a bizarre saying to bring up...SpunkySix wrote:So have all of the potential consequences of doing it before being in a position of stability... I've always said, if you want to gamble because the chances of winning are high enough, then fine, but gamble with your own life and not somebody else's.Potato wrote:Sex has been around much, much longer than the arbitrary concept of marriage.
You are putting a yet to be born child at risk by having vaginal sex before your relationship is stable and before you have any sort of reliable financial income. What happens when Emi gets pregnant and then they hit the bad ending?Potato wrote:Yeah, there is no gambling with somebody else's life anyway so that's just a bizarre saying to bring up...SpunkySix wrote:So have all of the potential consequences of doing it before being in a position of stability... I've always said, if you want to gamble because the chances of winning are high enough, then fine, but gamble with your own life and not somebody else's.Potato wrote:Sex has been around much, much longer than the arbitrary concept of marriage.
ASIDE: I promise it won't turn into an abortion debate, and so does everybody else here k?Guest Poster wrote:That said, Emi enjoys sex. There's no way she'd wait that for years.
Except humans don't exist to get married, humans exist to breed.SpunkySix wrote:So have all of the potential consequences of doing it before being in a position of stability... I've always said, if you want to gamble because the chances of winning are high enough, then fine, but gamble with your own life and not somebody else's.Potato wrote:Sex has been around much, much longer than the arbitrary concept of marriage.
Agreed. I'd rather not see this thread get cooked. It's... interestingMirage_GSM wrote:Can we please stop before this turns into an abortion debate?