Just read through all of them. I really liked it! Great work on these, and thanks for some entertaining stories.
Usually when I do these kinds of things I'll pick out one or two points I noted to improve on, but since you asked for feedback (specifically critical feedback, which isn't easy to ask for), and because I really like your stories, I'll write out something a bit more comprehensive for ya'. Some of these points will be minor. Some major. Others nitpicky. But they're all things I'd like to at least note if you're asking for feedback. Also, look more to the general rule or observation that I'm making than to the specific example I'm using - understanding why the segments should be changed and applying that to the rest of your future writing is more important than fixing those lines themselves.
After your first segment it was noted by other posters that it's tough to follow the dialogue - specifically which lines belong to which character. It is, and It's a problem throughout all of the stories. You said you purposely shied away from writing out what character says which line (ex. Hanako: Y-Yes...). You were right to do that - at least if we're talking about doing it in that format (Character: Dialogue). That's never a good idea unless you're actually writing a script. That said, I think you DO need to put speech tags in. A speech tag is a "he said"/"she said" after a chunk of dialogue. They're largely invisible to readers, and will not hurt a story. There are some times where their use is necessary, or else the reader loses who is saying what. A speech tag would look something like...
“Hopefully sooner rather than later,” I say.
Note that the period at the end of his dialogue becomes a comma, as the speech tag is actually a continuation of the sentence. There are exceptions to the "change punctuation to a comma at the end of the dialogue" rule - notably exclamation points and question marks. Those stay as they are, though the sentence still technically ends at the end of the tag.
"...What’s to stop you from doing the same?” she asks.
Speech tags are only really necessary to avoid confusion, though - you don't need them after every line of dialogue. The rule of thumb is that when there is a conversation, you use them to establish the order of speech, and then they can disappear when it becomes clear who is saying what.
“Hear me, Hisao?” Kenji asks.
"Yes," I reply.
"What did I say?"
"A gentleman never tells..."
"With more conviction, Hisao!"
"A gentleman never tells!"
(Awesome dialogue, btw)
There's a lot more to speech tags (entire topics can be devoted to them alone), but those are the basics, and speech tags aside I think there's an even bigger contributor to the confusion of who says what than the lack of tags. The formatting needs changed. The biggest thing confusing me as a reader is that you're dropping to a new line every time there is a new string of dialogue. Don't. The rule is (again, at its basics), and I think this is what's causing your confusion, that you drop to a new line every time there is a different
speaker. That is, if Lilly says something, you have to drop to a new paragraph before Hisao can open his mouth. But, you DON'T have to drop to a new line if it's the same person speaking twice -- even if there is unspoken text in between. For example, you wrote...
“How disappointing.”
She says this in a frank manner. I don’t suppose I disagree with her, though, even if getting here early was kind of nice.
“Would you like some tea, at least?”
Lilly spoke both lines of dialogue. Part of what is causing confusion is that since the second set of dialogue is dropped, it is implied that the speaker has changed, and that Hisao is actually saying it. He's not. Since all of that is by the same speaker, the entire segment should be bundled together. Then Hisao's response is laid out in the next paragraph.
“How disappointing.” She says this in a frank manner. I don’t suppose I disagree with her, though, even if getting here early was kind of nice. “Would you like some tea, at least?”
I prepare to make my rebuttal in a lighthearted tone. I don’t want to sound like I don’t enjoy being here, and sound happens to be one of the few things Lilly can gauge someone’s intentions on. “Do I really still have to answer that?”
After the second section (Tea for Two) there was some back and forth conversation about the lines, "I know this feeling. It’s called embarrassment." Silentcook said it should be cut. I concur. He told you to cut it because it made Hisao stupid for a split moment while he was not stupid for the rest of the section. I don't agree with his reasoning. That said, lines like this should be cut because they're redundant - they don't tell us anything that we don't already know. Here's the full relevant segment.
My face is overrun by a wave of heat as the blood rushes to it. I know this feeling. It’s called embarrassment. Luckily, Lilly can’t see my face, which -I’m certain- is bright red at the moment, but my silence probably conveys the same message. I tap my knuckle against the side of the desk to see if I can’t ease the situation a bit.
There are actually a few redundancies here, and I'd cut more than just the "I know this feeling" bit. It starts out with the blood rushing to his face. That gives us an image showing his reaction. Given the context of the scene, we know why it's happening, and it tells us what he's feeling. We don't need to be told he's embarrassed - we can already see it. The "I know this feeling" bit tells us the same thing twice, and in my opinion even drags the image we've been given before it down a bit. Also, what happens when blood rushes to your face? It turns red. That part can be cut too.
My face is overrun by a wave of heat as the blood rushes to it. Luckily, Lilly can’t see it, though my silence probably conveys the same message. I tap my knuckle against the side of the desk to see if I can’t ease the situation a bit.
[As a note, if you DO want to make it absolutely clear that he's embarrassed, you could add it in at the end and instead of what you have say, "...to see if I can't ease my embarrassment." I'd argue this is even better than "ease the situation," as that's a bit vague]
There are other kinds of redundancies throughout. Watch out for them. Specifically, I'll note some with adjectives. First of all, be very careful with adjectives and adverbs even when they aren't redundant. They're unnecessary 95% of the time, and ironically (irony intended) end up weakening sentences instead of making them stronger. An example from "Two for Two":
“It is a nice place. But we didn’t come here to simply stand around, did we?" A soft giggle appears to emanate from Lilly’s mouth. “I believe we should be eating soon.”
I don't think I've ever heard anything that could be hard enough to need qualifying that I would ever consider a giggle. The "soft" seems implicit in "giggle". They're light and bouncy by definition. The adjective "soft" can be removed without losing anything. Cut it. Going even further with this sentence, you can't giggle from anything but your mouth. We know the giggle had to come from there. "Emanat[ing] from Lilly's mouth" tells us something we already know implicitly. Cut that too. We're left with something like "Lilly appears to giggle," at which point you might as well just say fuck it and write "She giggles."
“It is a nice place. But we didn’t come here to simply stand around, did we?" She giggles. “I believe we should be eating soon.”
As a general rule, you want to cut as much as you possibly can. If it doesn't add anything, get rid of it. If it says something twice, that thing had better be REALLY important. If that thing IS really important, you should still probably cut it half the time anyway. I'll post up a few more examples of things that can be trimmed or removed.
It elicits a groan out of me. I groan.
She must genuinely believe what she’s saying.
I open my eyes for a moment to absorb the view. The moon shines[,] brightly in the night sky, unopposed. [and] (s)tars speckle and dot the rest of the canvass [above][.], and not a single cloud is present to detract from the scene. Looking downwards, I see the cityscape on the horizon flourishing with color[.] and [T]he jagged contours of rooftops and buildings strik[e] out into the sky.
“How disappointing[,]” (s)he says this in a frank manner. I don’t suppose I disagree with her, though, even if getting here early was kind of nice. “Would you like some tea, at least?”
Watch out for how you use ellipses (the ... things that denote a pause or an unfinished sentence). Unless they're absolutely necessary it's best to avoid using them. They don't actually convey anything. All they denote is a pause, and if the pause is important enough to mention, there are
usually better ways of including them than using ellipses.
...I’d hate to say that the final, biggest step in our relationship is one that I’m not willing to take right now. I want her to know that I love her, but I fear for my own well-being too. I guess I’d better give her some sort of response.
“…”
I keep trying to get something out, but my muscles aren’t cooperating. It feels like I’m seizing up. Damn it, what am I trying to say? Do we dare engage in this sensual dance with Death?
In this segment, it's very important that Hisao pauses. However, I don't think an ellipses is the best way to convey that. There's no actual depth to the ellipses - they are absolutely meaningless beyond their function. Use text instead, and try something like this:
...I’d hate to deny her something so important. I’d hate to say that the final, biggest step in our relationship is one that I’m not willing to take right now. I want her to know that I love her, but I fear for my own well-being too. I guess I’d better give her some sort of response.
But I can't think of anything. It feels like I’m seizing up. Damn it, what am I trying to say? Do we dare engage in this sensual dance with Death?
The "..." is replaced with "But I can't think of anything." It provides the same function (indicating a pause), but it also provides a little extra depth that the ellipses couldn't. Ellipses are important in visual mediums such as comic books or video games, where we don't have a constant connection to the character's thoughts outside of what's spoken in dialogue, but in those mediums they're only used because that deeper connection isn't as easy to create, if feasible at all. In written mediums, we do have a direct link to the character. Don't use substitutes. Even if you're not going for anything more than just a simple pause (with no deeper meaning), actually writing out "I pause" or "I don't respond" is better than "..."
Similarly, if ellipses are overused in dialogue or thought the character sounds very stilted. This is actually where ellipses can be very handy -- IF you're writing a character like Hanako whose speech patterns are, forgive me, crippled. With any other kind of character, though, it's best to drop the ellipses in most cases. Here's a string of thought form Hisao:
I know how she is, so I won’t blame her for this, but… it’s not something that we’ve talked about before.
The ellipses don't add anything to this. Does it show he's thinking? They're already his thoughts. He'd be thinking about thinking. I don't think it's a good idea to get meta here. It could be showing his unease, but, again, the content of the text already conveys that. Just drop the ellipses and have him think the lines like the man he is!
Again, though, that doesn't mean never use them. They're great for characters like Hanako (though I wouldn't use an ellipses to
start a sentence), and they should still be used as proper punctuation if a line is left unfinished.
That's it for my comments on the actual writing. You asked a few questions about story. Overall I think you're doing an excellent job on that front. I especially liked "Sorry Is Just a Word". I think that one had the strongest conflict, and the best writing overall. As a thought, though, if they're watching a video on reactions, why not have it be on exothermic reactions, specifically ones like combustion? I think that would make a stronger flashpoint for Hanako's meltdown, and it would mislead readers in a good way - they, along with Hisao, think she's upset about the fire, only to get punched in the face harder than he is with the revelation that it's actually their relationship that's got her down.
You specifically asked about the two endings for "Lunatics". I thought the second ending was much weaker than the first. As I saw it, the story was about their relationship, and acceptance of one another. That's hit on at the start of the second ending, when Hanako is afraid that he doesn't accept her because of her scars. The conflict within their relationship is building. But then suddenly he has a heart attack, and the conflict that was established is switched out just when it's getting good. I wanted to see the conflict be between Hisao and Hanako - the switch to his health was jarring. I also didn't believe her reaction would be enough to trigger a heart attack, especially after, as another reader noted, they were rolling down the hill like they were.
I also thought there could have been more in the last story, "Two For Two". A few things to think about - Kenji and Lilly were on a date, but we never see them interact with one another. In fact, they don't say anything to each other at all, save for Lilly asking a question to the both of them, which Hisao answers (though Kenji finishes the sentence for him - with one word). If the conflict is Kenji on a date, I want to see him do date like things. Actually interacting with a woman. Second, he knows Lilly. He has to have an opinion of her. What is it? We're never told, other than the fact that she's blonde, and he's especially weak for blondes. I want to know what he thinks about her specifically.
----------
I think that's the longest actual discussion post I've written in a few years. Must be something in the water. Ah well. They say explaining something is the best way to understand it yourself, so hopefully it'll help both of us. Like I said, I really enjoyed your stories, and I'm looking forward to the next one you put out. The only real way to improve is to practice, so keep at it.