Page 3 of 3

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:44 am
by Guest
You know, doing as in sexual intercourse
Also, this thread reeks of 4chan. Other than the original post.

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:06 pm
by Bara
Guest wrote:Also, this thread reeks of 4chan. Other than the original post.
Oh, I thought that smell was a dead skunk, but it is 4chan.
Don't blame 4chan for the twisted personalities that hang out here. Some folks in 4chan actively dislike KS; some folks overlap 4chan and KS, and some, like me, never even heard of 4chan until discovering KS. :lol:

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:32 pm
by Silentcook
Bara wrote:...and some, like me, never even heard of 4chan until discovering KS. :lol:
And now I feel bad 'cause of your getting exposed to that mess. :<

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:26 pm
by Guest
What motivates you people to make a point of announcing to everyone exactly how little time and effort went into something before posting it? Is it so people go "WOW, FOR A TEN MINUTE SKETCH IT'S GREAT!"? Is it for extra attention, or what? I don't get it.

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:02 pm
by Bara
Silentcook wrote:
Bara wrote:...and some, like me, never even heard of 4chan until discovering KS. :lol:
And now I feel bad 'cause of your getting exposed to that mess. :<
Ehh, like 4chan is anything to compare to the bullshit that flows from a bunch of beer swilling, drunk soldiers. I don't take much of 4chan to be more than a bunch of young kids crapping their diapers and crying for attention. I was immunized to far worse than 4chan many years ago. Any damage done to my personality was done well before access to the internet was available to the public. :wink:

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:26 am
by Kota
ITT: LOL 4CHAN SUCKS
GIVE ME COMPLIMENTS
HAI I LIKE TO FORUM

What was the point of this thread, again? Not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone else's points, but, I don't see very many.

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:01 pm
by Guest
Kota wrote:ITT: LOL 4CHAN SUCKS
GIVE ME COMPLIMENTS
HAI I LIKE TO FORUM

What was the point of this thread, again? Not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone else's points, but, I don't see very many.
What was the point of this post?

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:25 am
by carbonartistmonked
Guest wrote:
Kota wrote:ITT: LOL 4CHAN SUCKS
GIVE ME COMPLIMENTS
HAI I LIKE TO FORUM

What was the point of this thread, again? Not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone else's points, but, I don't see very many.
What was the point of this post?
i cant tell either X(

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:01 pm
by Vertical
INB4LOCK posts are frowned upon, and I can quote Suriko asking everyone to refrain from doing them.
NBC wrote:The more you know... *Uplifting Jingle*



As for the pic... proportions remind me of CLAMP, but seem accurate. The clothes don't look like they're resting on her body, but neither is their positioning exaggerated. Drawing people is not easy, yet our fascination with them is undenaible.

Don't let anything I say detract from doing more drawings. Stick to the basics and build upon them to improve.

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:46 am
by carbonartistmonked
ya know
i wish the mods will lock this
i prefer to have my fan art gone in to the depths of nowhere
rather than having people talking (sorry) nonsense when all i'm trying to do is show my art here
sorry people
guess i'm gonna abandon this site
doesn't matter does it?
it's just me
just one guy
its like i don't even exist
wow

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:22 am
by delta
Don't feel bad, it's just the internet. And I'd rather not lock threads if it isn't neccessary, but I'd also like to see fewer internet tough guys around here.

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:11 am
by Caesius
Just to be sure, you do realize what Konflicti was getting at with the redlines, right?


edit: And don't bump a thread that's been dead for 2+ weeks asking that the mods lock it 'cause nobody's commenting on your art. That's just plain contradictory. Basically, learn the difference between "thread revival" and "thread necromancy."

That said, if you wanted to bump it simply to ask for constructive criticism (without the emo fluff) that'd probably have been fine.


...speaking of constructive criticism, there was a story I read a long-ass time ago about a little girl who would draw 400 "eggs" in a single art class and considered herself an artist, and then a janitor came along and suggested that a real artist spends years painting a cat's single whisker. She got pouty, but hopefully learned a lesson at least!

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:25 am
by darkblade986
Yeah, it's a good drawing; definitely better than what I could ever manage. But you shouldn't put time limits on your art - start with what you have and continue to improve on it. Even when you think it's done, try and improve on it some more.

Also, there's only so many people who can comment before either the comments become stale or there just isn't anything more to comment on. With only one picture, there's really only reason for people to post once and then never come back. Improving on it and/or making new art would result in more comments and criticisms to be made, and thus more for you to take in to improve on later.

Re: hanako done under 10 mins

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:29 am
by Caesius
It's not a good drawing just because it's better than what you could do (see: Konflikti's post; it doesn't follow basic artistic/anatomical principles). There are tons of people whose handwriting is way better than mine, but I wouldn't consider their handwriting "good," simply due to the fact that my handwriting is hideous and should never ever be used as a standard of comparison.