Re: KS Shorts
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:10 pm
Alright, I'll bite. (Not too hard, but I have sharp teeth so I hope your skin is thick.) Here's some criticism for you.
Reading "The Walking Stick" felt like I was watching an episode of "Love Hina", so it was mildly amusing. In that sense, it was like a play being enacted by the KS characters without any rehearsal. You have a plot, and you force the characters to follow it doing what you want them to do, but not what they would do naturally on their own. Or, if they are doing what they would, there is no sense of a purpose behind it except to make Hisao into an invincible chick-magnet, much like how "Love Hina" is all about making Kentaro an invincible idiot-turned-accidental-pervert. It consists mostly of forced, static characters for the sake of forced drama and humor, or in this story's case action and romance, and the conflicts of personality, intent, or over miscommunications are never resolved.
For example: At the end Shizune steals the kiss you have all the girls trying for throughout the story, but Hanako and Emi are right there watching and don't react to it. Wouldn't they be angry, or depressed? What would they do? You only have the girls noticing what you need them to react to for the sake of the story, which is mostly Hisao, and make them ignore practically everything else. Characters are supposed to be people, not props; They won't always do what you want, unless what you want is for them to do what you think they want. (...and sometimes even then. Oh Lilly, you vex me so...)
That said, I really liked the way you wrote the beginning of the piece. It is very evocative and I almost thought you were writing from Lilly's perspective due to the sense of serenity it conveys and how you described everything through sound at first.
You did almost as good at the bridge, but didn't describe it. Is it a flat bridge? Arched? Suspension? Truss? Is it entirely made of wood or are parts of it rope? Metal? Stone? Is it a covered bridge? Is the wood visibly rotting or moldy? Cracked? Are there vines or other foliage encroaching upon it? Is where it touches the ground a cliff or is it a hill that slopes gently down to the water's edge? Is the river fast? Rocky? Wide? Thin? Is it shallow or deep? There's so much more information you can give your readers to let them picture the scene as you see it. Such description may not be directly important to the plot, but it can add depth and emotion to it or make the action seem to move slower for the reader and even pause where you want it to.
The word "board" was used a bit to frequently as well and it got repetitive. I would suggest you find ways to give it a break by using synonyms (planck, beam, timber, slat, shaft, girder, mast, spar) or refering to what the boards are a part of. (floor, deck, landing, catwalk, walkway, bridge, span, arch, overpass) Those are just what examples I could pull off the top of my head, so they may not work for you; It depends on what you envision. As a general rule of thumb I try never to use the same descriptive word or phrase more than once within a given paragraph, or adjoining paragraphs, (Or the entire piece if I can manage it.) because repetition is usually a bad thing unless you're trying to emphasize something with it. This has often forced me to expand my vocabulary.
...and there is no such thing (if you don't have a deadline) as too much re-reading and editing, so don't worry about that. I've edited "Golden Room" at least fifteen times since I posted it and have re-read it at least three times that much. There are still parts of it I'm not satisfied with. However, the more I do it (whether that be writing or editing), the faster I get at it and the more I catch each time. I just try to keep the mistakes I make in mind when I do the next piece so I can do better next time.
Anyway, you're definately improving, so keep at it!
Reading "The Walking Stick" felt like I was watching an episode of "Love Hina", so it was mildly amusing. In that sense, it was like a play being enacted by the KS characters without any rehearsal. You have a plot, and you force the characters to follow it doing what you want them to do, but not what they would do naturally on their own. Or, if they are doing what they would, there is no sense of a purpose behind it except to make Hisao into an invincible chick-magnet, much like how "Love Hina" is all about making Kentaro an invincible idiot-turned-accidental-pervert. It consists mostly of forced, static characters for the sake of forced drama and humor, or in this story's case action and romance, and the conflicts of personality, intent, or over miscommunications are never resolved.
For example: At the end Shizune steals the kiss you have all the girls trying for throughout the story, but Hanako and Emi are right there watching and don't react to it. Wouldn't they be angry, or depressed? What would they do? You only have the girls noticing what you need them to react to for the sake of the story, which is mostly Hisao, and make them ignore practically everything else. Characters are supposed to be people, not props; They won't always do what you want, unless what you want is for them to do what you think they want. (...and sometimes even then. Oh Lilly, you vex me so...)
That said, I really liked the way you wrote the beginning of the piece. It is very evocative and I almost thought you were writing from Lilly's perspective due to the sense of serenity it conveys and how you described everything through sound at first.
You did almost as good at the bridge, but didn't describe it. Is it a flat bridge? Arched? Suspension? Truss? Is it entirely made of wood or are parts of it rope? Metal? Stone? Is it a covered bridge? Is the wood visibly rotting or moldy? Cracked? Are there vines or other foliage encroaching upon it? Is where it touches the ground a cliff or is it a hill that slopes gently down to the water's edge? Is the river fast? Rocky? Wide? Thin? Is it shallow or deep? There's so much more information you can give your readers to let them picture the scene as you see it. Such description may not be directly important to the plot, but it can add depth and emotion to it or make the action seem to move slower for the reader and even pause where you want it to.
The word "board" was used a bit to frequently as well and it got repetitive. I would suggest you find ways to give it a break by using synonyms (planck, beam, timber, slat, shaft, girder, mast, spar) or refering to what the boards are a part of. (floor, deck, landing, catwalk, walkway, bridge, span, arch, overpass) Those are just what examples I could pull off the top of my head, so they may not work for you; It depends on what you envision. As a general rule of thumb I try never to use the same descriptive word or phrase more than once within a given paragraph, or adjoining paragraphs, (Or the entire piece if I can manage it.) because repetition is usually a bad thing unless you're trying to emphasize something with it. This has often forced me to expand my vocabulary.
...and there is no such thing (if you don't have a deadline) as too much re-reading and editing, so don't worry about that. I've edited "Golden Room" at least fifteen times since I posted it and have re-read it at least three times that much. There are still parts of it I'm not satisfied with. However, the more I do it (whether that be writing or editing), the faster I get at it and the more I catch each time. I just try to keep the mistakes I make in mind when I do the next piece so I can do better next time.
Anyway, you're definately improving, so keep at it!