Re: Can Shizune read lips?
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 6:45 pm
I have nothing to add to the topic right now, but I have to say that you have a beautiful avatar, dutic
That he does.Mirage_GSM wrote:I have nothing to add to the topic right now, but I have to say that you have a beautiful avatar, dutic
I dunno about JSL, but I've been half-heartedly studying BSL. Apparently the most important things Deaf people look for are the lips and facial expressions. All of the signing is primarily taken in through peripheral vision to help with differenciating the word.wazuzu wrote:From what I remember and understand, even if she can, it's the most basic stuff. She doesn't have the time to watch other people's mouthes, while simultaneously watching Misha's wrists.
HiMunchenhausen wrote:I know ASL is.
20/m/ukwazuzu wrote:HiMunchenhausen wrote:I know ASL is.
ASL
Guess as to what this means before looking it up: Belorussian Sign LanguageMunchenhausen wrote:BSL
Guess as to what this means before looking it up: Big Black YouthMunchenhausen wrote:U bby????
There is more mouthing in BSL than ASL, as I understand it. In ASL, facial expressions, brow position and mouth movements are used grammatically or to modify the meaning of what you're signing (in fact, failure to do this or use the correct ones can completely alter the meaning of what you're saying.) You are correct that eye contact is considered important, and you learn to watch a person's face rather than their hands when conversing.Munchenhausen wrote: I dunno about JSL, but I've been half-heartedly studying BSL. Apparently the most important things Deaf people look for are the lips and facial expressions. All of the signing is primarily taken in through peripheral vision to help with differenciating the word.
That being said, all I've done is read a 'BSL For Dummies', I could be wrong.
That and JSL could be completely different to BSL. I know ASL is.
Dutch Sign Language (NGT) is also the same, facial expression, brow position, mouth movements are grammatical elements or indeed sign modifiers, though NGT is more mouthing than ASL. Eye contact is more etiquette rather than 'reading lips'. I expect that this is the same for BSL. In fact, from what I gleaned from BBC's sign language interpreters, I don't see the difference between NGT and BSL in that aspect.metalangel wrote:Because that ASL joke never gets old.
BSL is British Sign Language, and is in a separate language family from ASL and JSL which are in their own (having evolved on their own, separately)
There is more mouthing in BSL than ASL, as I understand it. In ASL, facial expressions, brow position and mouth movements are used grammatically or to modify the meaning of what you're signing (in fact, failure to do this or use the correct ones can completely alter the meaning of what you're saying.) You are correct that eye contact is considered important, and you learn to watch a person's face rather than their hands when conversing.Munchenhausen wrote: I dunno about JSL, but I've been half-heartedly studying BSL. Apparently the most important things Deaf people look for are the lips and facial expressions. All of the signing is primarily taken in through peripheral vision to help with differenciating the word.
That being said, all I've done is read a 'BSL For Dummies', I could be wrong.
That and JSL could be completely different to BSL. I know ASL is.
Or she's a controlling troll who wanted him to learn sign language, which based on her character seems entirely possible. And I'm not joking either. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't rule either possibility out.Oddball wrote:I seem to recall a few times Hisao tried to communicate with her before he knew sign language and she always looked at him like he was a complete idiot. Seems if she knew how to read lips, she would have let him know.
I dunno man, I think that's a fairly small possibility (although it IS I guess). I'm with Oddball on this one, I think she'd have let him in at some point. And surely Misha wouldn't be able to control herself after a while anywaySpunkySix wrote:Or she's a controlling troll who wanted him to learn sign language, which based on her character seems entirely possible. And I'm not joking either. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't rule either possibility out.Oddball wrote:I seem to recall a few times Hisao tried to communicate with her before he knew sign language and she always looked at him like he was a complete idiot. Seems if she knew how to read lips, she would have let him know.
Now that I'm reading that back, it was sort of a stretch... oh well. Good point.AaronIsCrunchy wrote:I dunno man, I think that's a fairly small possibility (although it IS I guess). I'm with Oddball on this one, I think she'd have let him in at some point. And surely Misha wouldn't be able to control herself after a while anywaySpunkySix wrote:Or she's a controlling troll who wanted him to learn sign language, which based on her character seems entirely possible. And I'm not joking either. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't rule either possibility out.Oddball wrote:I seem to recall a few times Hisao tried to communicate with her before he knew sign language and she always looked at him like he was a complete idiot. Seems if she knew how to read lips, she would have let him know.
This is not my experience with it. I used to work with a deaf guy, and he did a lot better than any 30%. I'd put his performance at at least 90% with most people. (Not with me, though, unless I really tried to help, because I hardly move my lips when I talk, apparently. I shoulda been a ventriloquist.)Kutagh wrote:I'd put lip reading into Room 101. It's an useful tool to assist into understanding conversation, but it is just one of the tools available and on itself not sufficient. As per Wikipedia, supported by personal experience, only 30% of what is being said (not 30% in terms of how many words!) can be understood through lip reading alone.
There's more in the toolbox than just lip reading, that is what is improving his performance. Body language, context etc... If I work solely on lip reading, without context or body language then I'll achieve roughly 30%. Knowing what it should be about removes a lot of possibilities. For example, 'to' /'two'/''too', you can't hear nor see the difference. However if I say two beer, it is not logical to assume 'to beer' or 'too beer'. Though it could be 'two bear' too, unless you're in a pub.Atario wrote:This is not my experience with it. I used to work with a deaf guy, and he did a lot better than any 30%. I'd put his performance at at least 90% with most people. (Not with me, though, unless I really tried to help, because I hardly move my lips when I talk, apparently. I shoulda been a ventriloquist.)Kutagh wrote:I'd put lip reading into Room 101. It's an useful tool to assist into understanding conversation, but it is just one of the tools available and on itself not sufficient. As per Wikipedia, supported by personal experience, only 30% of what is being said (not 30% in terms of how many words!) can be understood through lip reading alone.
to beer or not to beerKutagh wrote: There's more in the toolbox than just lip reading, that is what is improving his performance. Body language, context etc... If I work solely on lip reading, without context or body language then I'll achieve roughly 30%. Knowing what it should be about removes a lot of possibilities. For example, 'to' /'two'/''too', you can't hear nor see the difference. However if I say two beer, it is not logical to assume 'to beer' or 'too beer'. Though it could be 'two bear' too, unless you're in a pub.