Tomate wrote:Can you two guys skip ahead to the ad hominem attacks?
I've been putting up on the argument, but of course~!
Well, it's a common scene anyway. I should've known that laying down some facts and analysis to a brick wall is not going to get anywhere<<you mean something like this? Well, maybe I should get started with it too--it itches me greatly.
Oddball wrote:
As are you. Misha is her own character and does show up several times to act on her own accord, WITHOUT Shizune. Usually when she shows up without Shizune it's to offer advice or urge Hisao on with his romantic situations, something Misha has far more experience and a personal interest in than Shizune does.
Alright, let's play a petty game shall we?
It's called quote-the-line. Find a line in the VN where Misha act on her own accord then paste the scene's title, ACT, and arc. And as I have mentioned before, her initiative to give romantic advice for Hisao in Shizune's arc are some of her only moments where she act on her own accord--perhaps you missed reading this part.
Again your bias shows though. Misha is with Shizune because Shizune wants to keep their friendship. This complete downplays the fact that Misha is the one with the stronger emotional attachment. Misha is the one who's changed her appearance and much of her personality to try in some pathetic attempt to be more appealing to Shizune.
Misha isn't there because Shizune wants hr to be. That's only a small fragment of it. Misha is there because MISHA wants to be there with Shizune, and when Hisao is having some romantic issues, Misha shows up to help him because she know how bad those things can feel.
Now that's what I said, ain't it? So maybe dot points will actually make things simpler:
-Misha likes Shizune
-Shizune rejects Misha's confession
-Shizune wants to keep Misha as a friend
-Misha stays with Shizune because she wants to (mainly her lingering attachment).
Although I have to disagree on your point about Misha showing up to help Hisao on romantic issues concerning Shizune. Because in regards to Misha, there is
no strong obligation or need for her to actually help Hisao; nor is there any goal she accomplished with it--thinking that any human being you come across would help one another without gaining anything in return is
naive at best.
This is what happen in Shizune's route regarding Misha and Hisao:
-Shizune expresses interest of Hisao to Misha--this of course is done before Hisao understands sign language (ACTI, Detour Ahead)
-Hisao joins the Student Council. Misha learns Hisao has interest in Shizune (entirety of ACTII)
-Misha--who still holds feelings for Shizune--wants to see her friend happy. She sets both Hisao and Shizune together on multiple occasion, playing the cupid between the two (Shizune ACTII, Talk to the Hand, Bread, Scissors, Paper, Interface, and finally, When Stars Embreace)
-Upon realizing she has achieved her goal by the end of ACTII, Misha was also faced upon the revelation that she will now be the 'third wheel' in the relationship, which lead to the decline until the end of ACT III.
Compare to your baseless argument, this one made a lot more sense doesn't it?
I do, and it's has nothing to do at all with what we're talking about. I tried to apply it somewhat to the actual discussion, but once again, you'd rather just insult other characters.
Insult? Huh, as humorous as you usually put it out anyway. I just did so a little more often than you.
Again, you keep twisting the meanings to support your own personal bias.
Shizune isn't the first girl Hisao interacts with. She's not even the first girl he notices when he comes to his new school. She's not even the first girl that he talks to (unless you're trying to count Misha and Shizune as a single character, which is another thing you seem to be having a problem with.)
And the whole thing is pointless because there simply isn't a canon route anyway. Even if there was a canon route, I wouldn't trust the word of somebody who's decided their own fanfiction is the canon ending for one of the routes to tell me what that canon is.
And
this is where I give you my face palm.
I don't twist words or meanings, I use them because I know what it means and the value it holds. When I read a story be it a VN or a novel, I look, analyze, then deconstruct the entire premise of the story before I give my judgment. If any, the person who keeps twisting
my words is
you. So here, I'll lay down my arguments on the supposedly 'canon route'; but before we start let's look at Iwanako shall we?
Iwanako is Hisao's supposed-to-be girlfriend who--unfortunately--broke his heart in the literal sense. She visits Hisao a number of times before eventually, bugged off until Hisao is admitted into Yamaku High. She sent one letter to Hisao that can easily be summarized as 'goodbye'. Do we know anything else about her? Nope. Does she contribute to
anything, be it a conversation in the main story line? Nope.
So what is Iwanako?
Iwanako is a
plot device, which is
an object or character whose sole purpose is to advance the plot of the story or--alternatively--resolve a conflict. And before you wonder, no Iwanako's letter is
not a character but an
object; we are talking about Iwanako as a character which--at this point--is still a mystery.
This concludes that Iwanako is
not a heroine nor is she a
side character. Iwanako is a
plot device. And yes, that was a mistake on my wording.
Which then returns to my point: who is the first heroine Hisao is introduced to? What
route is first introduced to Hisao? Shizune and Misha duo. And no, Misha and Shizune are not single-character, but
single routes as I've stated before, so get that right before you start twisting my words and point fingers at others for doing so.
and did I mention it's canon? No, I say it
feels canon and--following the trend in VN--it can be considered as such. And I actually forgot about that ending, but since you reminded me I might actually use it again--did I say it was canon? I don't think I said it was canon. Although I did say in a joking manner that it is a more 'legit' ending--again, get the facts straight in your head before twisting someone else's word.
you see, you can deny it all you want and I don't give a fuck. I lay down my arguments and start a discussion, you're always the one who end up butt-hurt in the end. Difference between you and me, I have something to back my claims and not just mere shout-outs of baseless emotions and word-twisting. You can continue, I don't care, but I will respond with full-force as what you have in the last post.
Misha doesn't antagonize anybody. She poses no obstacle whatsoever, save for a few moments in the very end of the route, and even that is entirely dependent on the player's choices. She is no antagonist.
An antagonist doesn't have to be evil, violent, or down-right destructive towards the main character. The sole purpose of an antagonist is to oppose the main character--which means providing conflict. The main conflict in Shizune's route--or the start of it--is Misha's lingering emotion towards Shizune and her slow decline from the trio. This is an obstacle the main characters have to pass; this is the conflict which makes Misha as the primary antagonist in Shizune's route.
another note, an antagonist can also be anything like the environment which is as prevalent in generic disaster movies.
Xanatos wrote:As a common trend in VNs, there is no official canon so it's irrelevant anyway. Shizune's route is no more canon than Kenji's (or anyone else's) so quit trying to make it so.
That is actually a possible premise. Though it still bugs me how the common VN market always introduce one particular route first which--when made into different adaptations--are considered to be the 'canon' lore; though your claim of 'questionable canon' is plausible.