Katawa Shoujo Forums

Snicket wrote:Alright i know i'm get crap for this, but who is Mikado?

Just so the first reply is no crap:
It's Misha.

Shiina Mikado on the website.

Or MIkado SHiinA in regular Japanese name order.

Great, crap answer coming through now.



Mikado is the European version of Pocky.

Juno wrote: Mikado is the European version of Pocky.

It also comes as chocolat noir for those who are interested in it.

Lawls wrote:

Caesius wrote:She's a girl.

so is Shirakawa

Why are you using surnames when most people don't keep track of that shit?


I mean, I was able to figure out Yuuko from the context, but still.

Deimos wrote: Just so the first reply is no crap:
It's Misha.

Shiina Mikado on the website.

Or MIkado SHiinA in regular Japanese name order.

Oh yeah. I haven't been to the web sight in a while, so i guess i forgot

Caesius wrote:Why are you using surnames when most people don't keep track of that shit?


I mean, I was able to figure out Yuuko from the context, but still.

I too am baffled as to why he is using their surnames... nobody else does. I think he might be confused about how Japanese names work.

Why are you using surnames when most people don't keep track of that shit?

since i joined the forums i have only been using the surnames. (and People just now noticed?) But i wanted to see how long i could do it for.

naw man EFF that they gotta put misha in the character section cuz shes like fukin awsome with her pink ass hair X[]

flurk wrote:-User was banned for this post-

... Wait, really? At first I thought flurk was making a joke but

Warwick wrote:Too bad flurk got banned.

Soo... looks like the devs really don't want to see 'Misha path' stuff anymore. Or maybe I'm just being trolled.

He is not banned. I assume it was an attempt at humor.

say if Mikado was in the minor character section would a large sum of people protest that she should be in the main character section?

I'm heavily tempted that when the next person puts "User was banned for this post" into their message for fun, I'll ban them for real.

☆♥Aura♥☆ wrote:He is not banned. I assume it was an attempt at humor.

Ah, thank you for clearing that up. It seems that both Warwick and I were confused.

Blue123 wrote:I'm heavily tempted that when the next person puts "User was banned for this post" into their message for fun, I'll ban them for real.

Ahaha, well, he got me, anyway.

Forums don't normally announce a user's ban in his bannable post anyway unless there is an outstanding reason to get everyone's attention. In this case, if the devs really did ban him it would sound like an admission that he let some guarded secret out or make the devs out to be really big jackasses for banning without clearly communicating a new rule about banned topics like how they announced HNNNG for the Shimmie board (to great futility). Wow this got off-topic.

Must... do... u-turn...

Lawls wrote:say if Mikado was in the minor character section would a large sum of people protest that she should be in the main character section?

The likelyhood that someone is crotchety enough to complain about something like that is just as likely as someone complaining about reasons for Misha not being there. Wait a minute...

Blue123 wrote:I'm heavily tempted that when the next person puts "User was banned for this post" into their message for fun, I'll ban them for real.

-Mod was lauded for this post-