Page 2 of 4
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:14 pm
by Suriko
☆♥Aura♥☆ wrote:googling "katawa shoujo" and any related variations gives some OH GOD THE HUMANITY WHY WHY WHY IS THIS DEMO SO POPULAR.
Fixed for last night's IRC shenanigans after some recent Goggling for results.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:50 pm
by kickurface
So the following is actually...over 9,000?
*Removes glasses dramatically* ....my god.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:17 pm
by Jakemuska
LolGoogleTrends
Finland is third...
So, how many Finns are on this forum?
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:15 pm
by Guess
This only comes to prove that there are more weeabos in Mexico that there are in Spain. Considering the number of latinamerican weaboos, it makes me wonder about the Spanish translation.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:53 pm
by Juno
As long as the translation uses a neutral Spanish every speaker should be happy.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:25 am
by Warwick
Atlanta, really? There must be other fans at Tech other than me...
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:18 pm
by Mr. Shine
Nice to see Sweden pulling its weight. Pleasanton seemed weird to me (having never heard of it before), but I guess it's technically part of San Francisco so that makes sense.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:13 pm
by Juno
I really wonder why the bulk of searches come from the Asian southeast. Maybe they want it translated so badly?
PS. Except for Singapore. Everyone speaks English there.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:42 pm
by Notguest
Warwick wrote:Atlanta, really? There must be other fans at Tech other than me...
Well there's a good chance of one more next fall
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:38 am
by Bara
Mr. Shine wrote:Nice to see Sweden pulling its weight. Pleasanton seemed weird to me (having never heard of it before), but I guess it's technically part of San Francisco so that makes sense.
Ahh, not that it matters at all, but Pleasanton is part of the SF Bay region, but it is in the East Bay over 2 hours travel time away and not on the peninsula with the City and County of San Francisco. (San Francisco fills the entire county. Unique local government setup in California so far as I know.)
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:07 am
by Mr. Shine
Bara wrote:Mr. Shine wrote:Nice to see Sweden pulling its weight. Pleasanton seemed weird to me (having never heard of it before), but I guess it's technically part of San Francisco so that makes sense.
Ahh, not that it matters at all, but Pleasanton is part of the SF Bay region, but it is in the East Bay over 2 hours travel time away and not on the peninsula with the City and County of San Francisco. (San Francisco fills the entire county. Unique local government setup in California so far as I know.)
Heh. Never been there, was just going by what I could glean from the Wikipedia article.
It's sort of like Chicago, then, with all the smaller towns and suburbs that 'count' as part of the city?
Indianapolis has a similar setup, where the city occupies all of the county. There are a few hold-outs, but it's still a really big area. I'm not sure if there are any others like that in the US.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:32 pm
by Bara
Mr. Shine wrote:Heh. Never been there, was just going by what I could glean from the Wikipedia article.
It's sort of like Chicago, then, with all the smaller towns and suburbs that 'count' as part of the city?
Indianapolis has a similar setup, where the city occupies all of the county. There are a few hold-outs, but it's still a really big area. I'm not sure if there are any others like that in the US.
Heh, I kind of kicked the thread sideways with my nit-picking so I guess I should not chat about local government setups.
I suspect Pleasanton, CA came up more due to a large number of commecial ISP server farms and such. You could call it "Internet Topography" or something.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:21 am
by eptsquare
Ha! I'm from Singapore
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:47 am
by Nightdragon
I still think I'm the only currently active duty military member who's a KS fan. Which kinda sucks because for the past month I've been without internet helping out a humanitarian aid mission in Indonesia (due to some earthquakes) and rejoining the other ships to continuing on with the MEU. I have to say though, KS definitely helped me keep my sanity during the long hours at sea where we do nothing.
Re: How large is the following for KS currently?
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:05 am
by cpl_crud
Nightdragon wrote:I still think I'm the only currently active duty military member who's a KS fan. Which kinda sucks because for the past month I've been without internet helping out a humanitarian aid mission in Indonesia (due to some earthquakes) and rejoining the other ships to continuing on with the MEU. I have to say though, KS definitely helped me keep my sanity during the long hours at sea where we do nothing.
You are not.
No, it's not me, but you are not the only serviceman who plays KS.