Katawa Shoujo Forums

So instead you want to break an internet toy?

tried it with lilly, he got her in one go
I was still pretty surprised

Ohohohoho! Just as I suspected! The Akinator didn't get Emi's feet (c-blades)! I win again!

It took it 5 tries to guess Shizune (he got it after asking whether the character had glasses)
Got Emi on the first try.
Got Hanako on the first try.
Got Rin on the first try.
Got Lilly on the first try.
Got Kenji in two tries.
Never got Misha.
Never got Hisao.
Never got Muto.
Never got Nurse.
Never got Akira.
Never got Hideaki.
Never got Iwanako.

"Is you character from a novel?"
guys help i cant answer this one...

G3n0c1de wrote:Never got Misha.

Curious, I just tried and got her on the first try.

sydwert wrote:"Is you character from a novel?"
guys help i cant answer this one...

The answer would be either no or probably. The akinator knows about Visual Novels.

Hypothermia wrote:So instead you want to break an internet toy?

Breaking it would be purposely giving it the wrong answers over and over again until he has Lilly under the "Real singer in Pakistan who has red hair" section, and repeating so every day so that she stays there. Just playing without telling him the answers is enough.

You have got to be kidding me. The Painting is in there. It's Yamaku Man's version of the painting, too.

I suppose if you fed in enough bogus info eventualy you could get it to spit out bad answers. The more good info goes into it the better the answers should be that come out.

Amusingly enough when he finally got Kenji (Took him two tries) it was the shooped one with the guitar in his hand

I was defeated using more popular characters like Kyon, Haruhi and Yoko, but I managed to beat it with Beckett (from Bloodlines) and Annah-of-the-Shadows (from Torment).

Ahhh, it got Zetsubou-sensei, the bastard.

And it got Shizune first try.

Akinator should EVENTUALLY learn to recognize any character that is shown to him, exclusively on the grounds that while correct information can be input by anybody familiar with the character, false information is either accidental or self-contradictory - and thus, less significant. It'd take considerable concerted effort or massive misinformation for it to "purposefully" misidentify someone.

(Or problems in its "reasoning" algorithm, that is.)

Also, some of the devs playing MIGHT have introduced answers that are correct, but are not known yet.

And I 'd at The Painting.

Silentcook wrote:It'd take considerable concerted effort or massive misinformation for it to "purposefully" misidentify someone..

Just as it takes deliberate effort to mess with online polls and such. Give too many idiots too much time and ...

Super Guest Man wrote:the shooped one with the guitar in his hand

Blushing like the motherfucking fist of the north star, here