And since it's made outside of Japan, with no mosaics either. Or keep it as a switch in the options.
Oh, and I'd like a full-on /h/ feel, not /e/

And you are right!BcDed wrote:Though I don't exactly have intimate knowledge of the law I'm inclined to believe they are ok.
I'm one, as explained in a previous post of mine. Sorry to inadvertently kill you.Xevo wrote:They don't?Guest wrote:not everyone plays VNs for the hentai*dies from shock*
agreed. "Love scenes" would make a lot more sense. Make the H in this game artistic and flow smoothly with the plot or not at all. But ya, like has been said, I'm think the writers will do fine.Khaos wrote:True.Jo-ou wrote:Sex scenes written for maximum emotional impact and not simply jacking off would add to the experience, not detract from it.
I have faith in the producers that they have enough sensitivity (which they already showed in the demo) to make those intimate scenes emotional, aesthetic and beautiful, which means, more tasteful than 99% of all existing hentai crap.
Close-ups of genitals, girls crying when fucked, awkward sexual positions or camera angles, litres of body fluids, those are the things that would ruin the game completely.
This game does not need "sex scenes" or "H-scenes", it needs "love scenes", if you catch my drift.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_stat ... ing_minorsLattyware wrote: I'd like to see sources on that. I do hate the way the country is going, but I don't think there are any laws (yet) that would make a VN such as this illegal. Either way. I live in the UK, and will be playing this game, full stop.
For those who are going tl;dr: [Citation Needed]
Definitions of words matters not, people will have differing opinionsKhaos wrote:There's on important point I'm interested in:
Is the (tasteful) depiction of a sexual act without explicitely showing any genitals considerd pornography?
As far as I know, porn is defined by explicitely showing erected penises, vaginas, etc, so it would be no pornography.
So, if the persons depicted were minors, would it then be considered pornography while it's not when they were adults?
Also the ages of the protagonists aren't given, they could as well be 18 or 19...
Any sexual act involving a minor, or any sexual act in the presence of a minor will be banned. Also, a minor counts for anyone who could be considered underage, meaning as long as they are flat chested or look cute, someone can see them as underage and so 'underage'. Basically, the entire cast, bar maybe Lilly, could be seen as underage.Khaos wrote:There's on important point I'm interested in:
Is the (tasteful) depiction of a sexual act without explicitely showing any genitals considerd pornography?
As far as I know, porn is defined by explicitely showing erected penises, vaginas, etc, so it would be no pornography.
So, if the persons depicted were minors, would it then be considered pornography while it's not when they were adults?
Also the ages of the protagonists aren't given, they could as well be 18 or 19...
Same here in Germany...porn industry took the law to court because it's discriminating young looking porn actresses.Guest wrote: Any sexual act involving a minor, or any sexual act in the presence of a minor will be banned. Also, a minor counts for anyone who could be considered underage, meaning as long as they are flat chested or look cute, someone can see them as underage and so 'underage'. Basically, the entire cast, bar maybe Lilly, could be seen as underage.
Fuck you, England. Fuck you.