Numb wrote:the only thing I would disagree with is the ending remark that "nobody wants to see your literary noodlings" because that was what happened with my Miki route. Sure, it's a rare case that the literary noodlings seem to actually go somewhere, but if you can keep it up for long enough, people will read it.
Late response (I just got home from a road trip,) but I think the quoted line on my two-year-old post has been slightly misconstrued.
I didn't mean something like "writing without an outline is never interesting."
MTtB doesn't have an outline, either. Most things I write don't have them (the Daphne Greengrass fanfic I'd like to someday write being the sole exception: I have like seventy notes on that motherfucker). Writing freestyle is great. Doing
anything freestyle, up to and including cooking (but not so far as explosive ordnance disposal) is always awesome. I would never advocate for writers to perform their recreation so rigidly.
That post was a response to a ficlet that, well, needed more time in the oven (and I'm not slamming the author in saying so, because they wiped the OP, so I think they'd be the first to agree—and though that thread did get heated, we
did eventually cool down over PM, and they
have gotten better). My perception of what was posted was that it was "practice" writing; it was written by somebody who didn't necessarily have a whole lot of experience writing this kind of thing, at least in English. When I said "don't expect to have much of an audience for your literary noodling," what I meant was "if you're just writing shit down to get better at writing shit down, don't expect to get a whole lot of praise or feedback."
And I still stand by what I said, whether or not it was warranted in that thread—writing communities really
aren't a bunch of freelance English teachers. I mean, I don't know; maybe other people enjoy holding new writers' hands through their first couple crude drabbles, but for me it's like a second job I don't get paid for. If I'm literally correcting people's SPaG, I should at least get adjunct professor pay. Or an internship credit, or something.
brythain wrote:What can be gained from critical discussion of the few 'minor' Iwanakos and Leaty's magnum opus is an understanding of how the character, no matter how blank-slate, can be developed from three things: the opening scene, the variability of the Iwanako Letter device, and Hisao's thoughts on the matter.
I hesitate to interfere too much in this discussion, but there's one thing I'd like to point out, since I think it's been overlooked:
Iwanako, as she's portrayed in my fic, was developed in three stages from three different sources, respectively. The primary source, obviously, was the totality of Iwanako content that appears in the VN—the prologue, the letter, and Hisao's protean ruminations on her character (as well as secondary but still quasi-authoritative sources, like her depiction on the cover of
Midwinter). Whatever personality Iwanako had in my story, she absolutely
had to be emotionally, intellectually, and physically congruous with everything established about her. Some examples: the letter Iwanako wrote to Hisao was written on fancy stationery with a pink pen, so in
MTtB she's extremely feminine and slightly vain. She's also described in more than one route as "fragile", and... well, I don't need to explain what I did with that, I don't think.
The secondary source was
Hisao himself—I really wanted to play up the "mirror universe" vibe, and I wanted the story to feel as different (narratively, as opposed to tonally) from canon as possible, so wherever it was reasonable, I made Iwanako a
literal inversion of Hisao's strengths and weaknesses. Hisao disliked TV and read books, so Iwanako watched TV and disliked books. Hisao's family didn't have a whole lot of money, so I made Iwanako pretty well-off. Hisao's an only child, so Iwanako has an older brother. Hisao's great at science and terrible at English, so Iwanako is the reverse. Hisao is somewhat oblivious, so Iwanako is somewhat paranoid. Et cetera, et cetera. At every step, Hisao was literally the guideline through which I characterized her. A
lot of what people might attribute to my own invention was actually just my following a template.
The tertiary source is myself, obviously. Having established the character based on the guidelines above, I just did whatever I wanted with her—whatever I thought would be cool. All of her "miscellaneous" character traits—stuff that wouldn't have come from the above two sources—
that's where I really made shit up from whole cloth, mostly for my own amusement. But I try to be diligent about having a "hierarchy"—the primary sources are what is primary and inviolable to the character, and so on and so forth.
So I wouldn't go
quite so far as to say I treated Iwanako as a blank slate—ultimately I took cues from the devs in establishing her, albeit perhaps not directly. To me, making Iwanako a reflection of Hisao seemed pretty intuitive—she just
looked to me like she would be as different from Hisao as possible. So I took it from there.
Oh, and before I forget, thank you all for the words of praise! This thread made me blush this morning.