Liminaut wrote:This Misha's disability thing is really annoying, y'know?
I've come around to Mirage's point of view that there is no support for any physical disability for Misha in the VN. I could make a case for clinical depression (as opposed to teenage angst because she's been jilted) but there are multiple instances in the VN of being told Yamaku doesn't take mental disabilities. That leaves the option that Misha doesn't have any disabilities, but that creates another absolutely unanswerable question of why she is at Yamaku, as opposed to another school. Misha says she is her to learn sign language, but who decides as fifteen that their dream is being a sign language interpreter? If that's the reason Misha is at Yamaku then there is another, huge question of why does she want to become a sign language interpreter?
The only other clue I can think of is that Misha's life before coming to Yamaku was bad enough that being left alone seemed like a big step up. I could make up a story about how Misha needed to get into a very supportive private school and the family could swing Yamaku if Misha learned sign, but there's no support for that in the VN.
...
Like I said, this Misha disability thing is really annoying. The story function of the disabilities is to show that the students of Yamaku are very strong and resourceful. That's not part of Misha's story.
That's kind of the nature of KS. There are huge chunks of the story, such as how Lilly feels about her parents, that are just left out completely. Hemingway said that leaving stuff out of a story makes the story stronger, as long as the author knows what the resolution to these missing pieces are.
Guest Poster wrote:Not interpretor. Teacher. And why not? Lilly decided in middle school that she wanted to become an English teacher and she's stuck with that throughout high school. No reason for Misha to be different.
I agree with Brythain. Certain things aren't very important to the main plotline and don't need to be known in order to enjoy the story the author wants to tell. It's often more fun to leave it up to the imagination of the readers.
Now, you see, I can respect that. Unfortunately, I can't go that far myself. Mostly because no one who supports that viewpoint has been able to give a satisfactory answer to the following:
In her big rooftop confession, Misha admits two things: that she didn't want to come to Yamaku at first, and that she was "exposed" about the fact that she didn't know sign language. The former implies a situation where going to Yamaku was presented to her before she elected to go there, and the latter implies that there was some degree of deception in her coming to Yamaku on a Sign Language pretext. Together, they put serious question to the idea that she came to Yamaku because she wanted to be a sign language teacher. Who relocates to an entirely different school they don't really want to go to teach something they don't know themselves (and potentially have no intention of learning)?
Her previous school/classmates having a Hanako-level hate boner for her only gets you so far. We still need to answer who or what planted the idea of going to a cripple school in her head in the first place, and what exactly it means that she was "exposed" for not knowing Sign Language. There's no "exposure" going on when an incoming student learning Sign Language is *gasp* revealed to not know
what they were coming to the school to learn. I'd compare it to a Med School resident - yeah, he's coming to the residency to learn, but he's still expected to know a lot of prerequisites before he ever steps foot in the residency.
So I'm willing to accept the "no (physical) disabilities" as a plausible theory. But in doing so, I maintain that we'd need to resolve the above situation before we can consider it anything stronger than "plausible."
And as for the last bit, about being open for interpretation, isn't that the
entire point of this discussion? About the fact that the devs have strongly implied that there's a "canon" reason that they'll take with them to their graves? If it's supposed to be open to interpretation, we should be allowed to, you know,
interpret it. I'll agree that there are elements of this discussion that are annoying, not the least being the repetition of several points over the course of passing years, but the core idea - discussion of whether or not Misha has a disability, and what it might be - remains quite relevant and worthwhile.